The Donovan trade

As the long offseason winds down and spring training fast approaches, Your Seattle Mariners have finally made a personnel move, trading for infielder/outfielder Brendan Donovan.

I'm of two minds about this trade. First, yay, I like Brendan Donovan. He's an outstanding defensive second baseman with a great eye at the plate and offers the sort of batting profile I want to see: solid on-base skills, not especially streaky over his career (though last year there were some good and bad months), not power-focused. He's not fast, he won't steal many bags, but he should be a solid presence in a lineup that needs it. Donovan is a good get, solid target for a trade.

Second, boo, I'm not happy with with who got traded away and how that affects the depth chart. The M's sent third baseman Ben Williamson to the Tampa Bay Rays in the convoluted three-team deal, which isn't great on two fronts: Firstly, Williamson is one of the best defensive third basemen I've ever seen play, and as I place more value on defense than does the baseball world generally I'd have been far more interested in keeping him and trading one of the other high-level prospects instead; and secondly, losing Williamson means there is no incumbent third baseman, thus Donovan will likely be asked to play there instead of at his customary second base position. You may recall the M's tried this sort of thing last year with Jorge Polanco, who did not last long at third base. Donovan is a good defender wherever he plays—he owns a Gold Gove as a utility player from 2022—but he is best at the keystone. The Mariners must feel like rookie second-sacker Cole Young is actually as good as his minor-league hype even though in a brief stay with the big club last year he was quite overmatched in his way-too-early promotion; I was also unimpressed with his defense.

The Mariners also gave up prospects Tai Peete and Jurrangelo Cijntje; aside from having a great name, Peete, as an outfielder, didn't hold a lot of value for the M's, so I don't mind that, but it's sad to give up Cijntje just because of the novelty—he's that rare breed known as a switch-pitcher, who can throw 90+ with either arm with an impressive degree of accuracy. Overall, of the three teams in the trade—Mariners, Rays, and St. Louis Cardinals—the M's may have done the worst. The Rays get an elite defensive third baseman who has shown hitting chops at the Triple-A level if not the bigs and all they gave up was a low-level OF prospect and a low competitive balance draft pick; while St. Louis gets those two prospects, another minor-league outfielder from the Rays, and two competitive balance draft selections in exchange for Donovan in a classic stock-the-farm rebuilding move.

Even if Williamson didn't hit much, the team could probably carry him in the lineup as a great-glove-weak-bat type. Young, not so much. He's going to have to hit or stay in the minors. The M's do have Ryan Bliss as a 2B option, he was the opening day starter last season before going down with injury and missing most of the year. So they might be OK. But I'd still have much rather seen Young go in the trade instead of Williamson, which would have given the M's an infield of Josh Naylor, Brendan Donovan, J.P. Crawford, and Ben Williamson first-to-third, a defensive quartet to rival that of the 1999 Mets in excellence. Naylor-Young-Crawford-Donovan is good, but not elite. Plus, there is no depth at the third base position now, none of the upper prospects on the farm have much experience at the position, whereas there are several decent second basemen.

So... short-term, this helps the Mariners' lineup (but not the defense), therefore, good trade, though it seems like it could easily have been better. Longer term, well, Donovan is a free agent after the ’27 season, by which time we'll have a better idea if Young can live up to his first-round-draftee status and how much we miss (or don't) Williamson.